Skip to main content
Placeholder image for Brailsford House
Brailsford HouseNottinghamshire

Illustrative image. Photographs of this home have not yet been added.

Rated:Requires ImprovementResidential

Brailsford House

1 Main Street, Harworth, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN11 8LE
01302742156
Care Type

Residential Care

Assessment date

2 October 2024

Provider

Reason Care (UK) Limited

Beds

20 beds

How this home compares nearby

Of 5 care homes for older people within 5 miles, 5 are rated higher by CQC, none are the same and none are lower.

2 of these nearby homes have been inspected more recently than this one.

Based on CQC ratings, updated 22 October 2026. How we compare homes | See the nearby homes

Rating history

  1. GoodMar 2016
  2. Requires ImprovementMay 2019
  3. Requires ImprovementApr 2025

Rating dropped from Good to Requires Improvement in 2019.

Source: CQC inspection reports. Contains CQC data licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Costs and who runs this home

This is the only care home Reason Care (UK) Limited runs in England.

Average care home fees in the East Midlands: £958 a week for residential care and £1,250 for nursing care (2024-25 averages). Self-funders usually pay more. See our care home costs guide.

  • This home lists dementia care, which usually costs more than standard residential care. See dementia care home costs. NHS Continuing Healthcare may apply where someone's needs are primarily health needs.
  • How to pay for a care home explains the council means test, what counts as capital and the funding you can ask to be assessed for.

About Brailsford House

Brailsford House is a residential care home in Nottinghamshire, providing support to older people, including those living with dementia. The findings below set out what the CQC found on its most recent inspection.

Brailsford House is a residential care home providing support to older people, including those living with dementia. The CQC rated the service Requires Improvement overall, finding breaches relating to safeguarding, safe care and treatment, and governance. Some safety incidents were not reported to safeguarding teams, care plans lacked clear guidance, staffing levels were not always sufficient, and the building needed maintenance, though improvements were under way.

Inspectors found people mostly spoke positively about staff and felt safe, and were confident their views were listened to. However, privacy was not always respected, staff feedback about workplace culture was mixed, and governance was not always effective enough to maintain expected standards.

Source: CQC assessment, 3 April 2025

Specialist Care

DementiaOlder people

Fees and availability

We have not verified a current weekly fee for this home. Ask for a written quote based on the room and care needed, including any extra charges.

Check current vacancies, the admission assessment and visiting arrangements directly with the home.

Care and inspection details

Checked against the CQC register on 20 September 2026. This is a check of published information, not a visit to the home.

Registered service
Care home service without nursing
Registered capacity
20 places — this is not a vacancy count
Registration checked
Registered · DN11 8LE

Registered care categories

Caring for adults over 65 yrs; Dementia.

These describe the registration. The home must assess whether it can meet the individual person's needs and whether a place is available.

CQC ratings in more detail

Overall rating shown by CQC: Requires Improvement.

Assessment published 3 April 2025. Assessment date recorded: 2 October 2024.

Read CQC's assessment overview

The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 3 April 2025. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.

Date of Assessment: 4 November 2024. The service is a residential home providing support to older people, and those living with dementia. We found 3 breaches of the legal regulations in relation to safeguarding, safe care and treatment and governance. People were not always safe from abuse, as incidents were not always reported to the local safeguarding team to investigate. Care plans did not always give clear guidance to staff. The facilities were not always well maintained. However, we saw the provider was making improvements to the building at the time of our assessment. People did not always receive their ‘as required’ medicines safely, but other medicines were managed safely. There were not always enough staff to support people. People were not always involved in assessments of their needs but people felt that staff knew them well. People always had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff worked with other professionals to ensure people had good outcomes. Staff encouraged people to consent to care given. Where people could not give consent, they were supported in line with the Mental Capacity Act. People were mostly treated with kindness. They spoke positively about the staff team and culture. However, we saw 2 occasions where people’s privacy was not well supported. People who used the service knew how to give their views and were confident the service took this seriously and acted on it. Staff did not always report positively about they service. They felt their feedback was not always valued. We received mixed feedback from staff about the culture of the service. There was not always effective governance, to ensure the home was run in line with expected standards. In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and / or appeals have been concluded.

Safe
Requires Improvement
Effective
Requires Improvement
Caring
Requires Improvement
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Questions prompted by these ratings

  • Safe: What changes have been made to medicines, staffing and safeguarding since this rating?
  • Effective: How are staff training, nutrition and health outcomes checked now?
  • Caring: How do staff protect privacy, dignity and each person’s choices?
  • Well-led: What has changed in management, checks and oversight since this rating?

These are questions for your visit, not a claim about conditions today.

Read Brailsford House's CQC record and reports.

Contains Care Quality Commission information under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ratings and registration details can change after the date checked.

5 Questions to Ask on Your Visit

When visiting Brailsford House, consider asking...

  1. 1.What specific dementia training do staff receive and how recently?
  2. 2.How do you support a resident who becomes distressed or confused?
  3. 3.How does the home keep a record of a resident's life history and personal preferences?
  4. 4.How do you involve families as dementia progresses and communication becomes harder?
  5. 5.What happens when a resident's dementia reaches an advanced stage?

5 Things to Look For on Your Visit

When you visit Brailsford House, look out for...

  1. 1.Is the environment calm, uncluttered and easy to navigate?
  2. 2.Do staff speak to residents with patience and dignity, even if they repeat themselves?
  3. 3.Are there memory cues around the home -- photos, familiar objects, clear signage?
  4. 4.Do residents seem settled and safe, or agitated and unsupervised?
  5. 5.Is there meaningful activity happening, or are residents just sitting quietly with nothing to do?

Could the NHS fund Brailsford House's fees?

The average nursing home costs £1,535 per week. That's £79,820 a year. NHS Continuing Healthcare could cover all of it. No means test, no contribution from you.

Location

1 Main Street, Harworth, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN11 8LE

CQC Logo

Brailsford House

CQC overall rating

Requires Improvement

Assessment date: 2 October 2024

View full inspection report
New

Have a question about this care home?

Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.

Share what's on your mind
01302742156