Springfield House Nursing Home

The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 6 August 2026. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.

Our view of the service

About the service

Springfield House Nursing Home is a family owned and operated care home and is registered to provide care, nursing and support for up to 27 people.

Who the service is for The service provides nursing care, treatment and support for older people and those living with specific health and medical conditions, including those living with dementia.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 24 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

People were supported by staff who knew them well, many of the staff working in the home had long service. They told us they were a family. Risks to people’s wellbeing and safety had been assessed and staff worked to ensure people remained well. Staff were recruited safely and had received training to enable them to carry out their role effectively. Staff told us they were supported and could rely on their colleagues. Medicines were managed safely and monitoring checks meant they were administered and stored correctly. The environment was homely and well maintained. Lessons were learnt from events that occurred within the service and learning was shared with the staff team. Staff knew how to raise concerns around safeguarding and records showed referrals were made as necessary to the local authority.

People’s needs had been assessed, and care plans were person-centred and reviewed regularly. Conversations around consent had taken place and were recorded in accordance with legal requirements. People were given choices and options about how they wished to spend their day. The provider used various ways to measure people’s general health and wellbeing including to monitor their weight, nutrition and skin integrity.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

Staff were kind and caring and they told us they could rely on each other for support. Staff promoted people’s independence and told us this was to ensure people lived as well as they could for as long as possible. A member of staff told us people’s, “Independence is maintained, we make sure everything is ok and we try and meet their expectations.” People’s medical and health needs were well managed and there were continuous communications with external medical practitioners.

People’s care was person-centred, and we overwhelmingly received positive comments and feedback about the standard of care at Springfield House Nursing Home. The provider worked closely and effectively with many external health and social care professionals who were complimentary about the ethos of the service. The management team and staff worked towards the best for the people who lived at Springfield House Nursing Home, to ensure everyone had a voice.

Governance systems were operating effectively to ensure the smooth running of the service. Audits and quality assurance processes in place meant the registered manager could identify shortfalls and put actions in place to remedy them or prevent reoccurrence. The provider ensured regular checks of the service which meant governance was multi-layered. The provider worked well in partnership with others and were well known and respected within the local community. A professional told us, “It’s a tremendous home, for me it’s all about the quality of the care, and they do that here.” Another said, “They are brilliant here, they are really good, it’s unique.” The registered manager and provider sought to keep up to date with progress and changes in social care and attended workshops and opportunities for sharing good practice and learning.