
Illustrative image. Photographs of this home have not yet been added.
King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities
Residential Care
30 April 2026
Leonard Cheshire Disability
18 beds
Rating history
- Jan 2015
- Sept 2016
- Dec 2018
- Jun 2026
Rating dropped from Good to Requires Improvement in 2026. CQC has rated this home 4 times since 2015.
Source: CQC inspection reports. Contains CQC data licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Costs and who runs this home
Run by Leonard Cheshire Disability, which runs 34 care homes in England: 20 rated Good and 14 Requires Improvement.
Average care home fees in the East Midlands: £958 a week for residential care and £1,250 for nursing care (2024-25 averages). Self-funders usually pay more. See our care home costs guide.
- How to pay for a care home explains the council means test, what counts as capital and the funding you can ask to be assessed for.
About King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities
King Street is a residential care home in Leicestershire supporting autistic people and people with learning and physical disabilities. Full details from the CQC's most recent assessment are set out below.
King Street provides accommodation and personal care for autistic people and people with learning and physical disabilities, supporting 17 people at the time of assessment. The CQC found risk management and staffing safety had improved, moving the service out of special measures. However, inspectors found staff skill mix and consistency still fell short at times, limiting people's access to the community and personal goals.
Governance was strengthening under an interim manager, though systems were still embedding rather than fully proven. People gave mixed feedback, praising kind staff but raising concerns about turnover and communication. Inspectors rated the home requires improvement overall, with caring, responsive and well-led also requiring improvement.
Source: CQC assessment, 29 June 2026
Specialist Care
Fees and availability
We have not verified a current weekly fee for this home. Ask for a written quote based on the room and care needed, including any extra charges.
Check current vacancies, the admission assessment and visiting arrangements directly with the home.
Care and inspection details
Checked against the CQC register on 20 September 2026. This is a check of published information, not a visit to the home.
- Registered service
- Care home service without nursing
- Registered capacity
- 18 places — this is not a vacancy count
- Registration checked
- Registered · LE12 7LZ
Registered care categories
Caring for adults over 65 yrs; Caring for adults under 65 yrs; Learning disabilities; Physical disabilities.
These describe the registration. The home must assess whether it can meet the individual person's needs and whether a place is available.
CQC ratings in more detail
Overall rating shown by CQC: .
Assessment published 29 June 2026. Assessment date recorded: 30 April 2026.
Read CQC's assessment overview
The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 29 June 2026. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.
Date of inspection 19 20 May 2026. The inspection of this location was prompted due to the service being in special measures. We undertook a comprehensive inspection.
King Street, Care Home Physical Disabilities provide accommodation for people requiring nursing or personal care. The building is purpose built with ensuite rooms, including various communal spaces which comprise of multiple lounges, kitchens and dining areas, a games room, a gym space and bathroom facilities. The service provides support to autistic people and to people with learning and physical disabilities. At the time of our inspection there were 17 people receiving the regulated activity of personal care. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
The provider demonstrated a proactive and transparent safety culture, where staff listened to concerns, reported incidents and used learning to improve practice.
People were involved in managing risks associated with their care, systems were in place that guided staff in meeting a wide range of complex health needs. Person‑centred risk assessments and clear clinical protocols ensured staff had the information required to deliver safe, consistent care while promoting independence.
Staffing skill mix and experience were improving. The provider had taken proactive steps to recruit and onboard new team members following a recent service restructure. However, the skill mix and experience within the team had not always been sufficient to fully meet people’s needs. At times, this had affected the consistency of care delivered and limited people’s opportunities to access the community and pursue their personal goals and interests. The provider recognised these shortfalls and was taking action to address them through ongoing recruitment and development of the workforce.
People did not consistently have clear progression plans setting out how they would be supported to develop skills, increase independence or achieve their personal goals. As a result, opportunities for growth were not always identified or monitored, and staff did not consistently promote people’s progress. This limited people’s ability to move forward in line with their aspirations and potential.
Governance and accountability arrangements were developing well, with clear progress made since the last inspection. The interim manager had introduced strengthened oversight, improved risk‑management processes and more structured monitoring systems, supported by increased involvement from the wider leadership team. These changes were beginning to enhance visibility of risk, improve responsiveness and support safer, more consistent practice. Although these systems were still embedding and had not yet delivered sustained improvements across all areas, there was a strong commitment to ongoing development, and the foundations for more effective, reliable governance were clearly taking shape.
The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulations in relation to Safe Care and Treatment, Safe and Effective Staffing and Good Governance. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.
This service has been in Special Measures since 17 October 2025. The provider demonstrated improvements have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.
- Safe
- Effective
- Caring
- Responsive
- Well-led
Questions prompted by these ratings
- Caring: How do staff protect privacy, dignity and each person’s choices?
- Responsive: How are care plans, activities and complaints adapted to each resident?
- Well-led: What has changed in management, checks and oversight since this rating?
These are questions for your visit, not a claim about conditions today.
Read King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities's CQC record and reports.
Contains Care Quality Commission information under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ratings and registration details can change after the date checked.
5 Questions to Ask on Your Visit
When visiting King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities, consider asking...
- 1.What happens if my relative's care needs increase significantly -- will they have to move?
- 2.How do you handle concerns or complaints from families?
- 3.What does the monthly fee cover and what will cost extra?
- 4.How do you keep families informed about their relative's day-to-day wellbeing?
- 5.What happens if my relative is unhappy here?
5 Things to Look For on Your Visit
When you visit King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities, look out for...
- 1.Do staff greet residents by name and stop to chat?
- 2.Are residents dressed, up and occupied, or sitting alone in front of a TV?
- 3.Does the home smell fresh and feel clean without being clinical?
- 4.Do residents look comfortable and at ease, or anxious and withdrawn?
- 5.Does the manager answer your questions openly or deflect?
Could the NHS fund King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities's fees?
The average nursing home costs £1,535 per week. That's £79,820 a year. NHS Continuing Healthcare could cover all of it. No means test, no contribution from you.
Location
61/63 King Street, Sileby, Leicestershire, LE12 7LZ

King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities
CQC overall rating
Assessment date: 30 April 2026
Helpful Guides
Have a question about this care home?
Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.
Share what's on your mindFind Out If King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities Is Right for You
Start the conversation and request a callback from this home.
A free daily companion for someone with dementia
Shows the date, weather, family photos, and a daily question. Set up in 10 minutes.
Other Care Homes Near LE12 7LZ
Listings with similar recorded care types and specialisms are shown first. Confirm care needs and availability directly with each home.

Highbury Residential Home
38 Mountsorrel Lane, Sileby, Loughborough
Residential care
0.2 miles away (straight-line distance)

Mountview Care Home
1093 Loughborough Road, Rothley, Leicester, Leicestershire
Residential care
1.1 miles away (straight-line distance)

Quarry Hill Grange Residential Home
Watling Street, Mountsorrel, Loughborough, Leicestershire
Residential care
1.3 miles away (straight-line distance)

Rose Cottage Rest Home
136 Rothley Road, Mountsorrel, Loughborough, Leicestershire
Residential care
1.4 miles away (straight-line distance)

Pinglenook Residential Home
229 Sileby Road, Barrow Upon Soar, Loughborough, Leicestershire
Residential care
1.4 miles away (straight-line distance)

Ayeesha-Raj Care Home
86 Loughborough Road, Mountsorrel, Loughborough, Leicestershire
Residential care
1.6 miles away (straight-line distance)