Dorrington House (Wells)

The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 30 July 2026. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.

Date of Assessment: 19 May to 2 July 2026.Dorrington House (Wells) is a residential care home that can accommodate up to 38 older people, some of whom may be living with a dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 35 people living in the home. The last rating for this service was Requires Improvement (report published 26 January 2021). The provider was in breach of regulations relating to Safe care and treatment, Good governance, Fit and proper persons employed and Staffing. We carried out this assessment because of the length of time since the last inspection and to check whether sufficient improvements had been made. We found the provider had taken appropriate action to address the concerns identified. Sufficient improvements had been made, and the required level of compliance had been achieved, which meant the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.During our site visit on 19 May 2026, we identified some issues regarding cleanliness, infection control and some environmental safety issues, which had not been identified during the management’s auditing process. However, the management team took immediate steps with the provider to rectify the issues and, by the time of our 2nd site visit on 11 June 2026, significant improvements had been made.People received a safe service, were protected from abuse or neglect and had their human rights promoted. Robust recruitment procedures were followed. There were sufficient staff to meet people’s needs and keep them safe. Risks to people were assessed and their safety was monitored and managed. Accidents and incidents were monitored and analysed, so lessons could be learned and recurrences avoided.People had their needs assessed and care plans were compiled to meet their individual requirements. People were supported to live healthy and safe lifestyles and had full support to access healthcare professionals, as needed. Staff understood the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and made sure people consented to their care and support.Care plans were regularly reviewed and kept up to date. People were supported to make a complaint if needed and they were listened to and responded to appropriately. Information from complaints, comments or concerns was used to help drive improvement.People received a personalised service and were fully involved in all aspects of their care and support. Staff worked with people in accordance with their care plans, but also made sure people were encouraged to do as much for themselves as possible. Information was accessible and available to people in a format suitable for their communication needs. Equality and diversity was consistently promoted and respected for everyone.The provider’s quality assurance systems were generally effective and helped ensure care was delivered safely and in accordance with people’s needs and legal requirements. However, some checks and audits were not fully robust and needed strengthening to consistently identify and address areas requiring improvement.