Skip to main content
Placeholder image for Townsend Hub
Townsend HubLiverpool

Illustrative image. Photographs of this home have not yet been added.

Rated:Requires ImprovementResidential

Townsend Hub

106 Townsend Lane, Anfield, Liverpool, L6 0BB
07709398560
Care Type

Residential Care

Assessment date

3 November 2025

Provider

Liverpool City Council

Beds

35 beds

How this home compares nearby

Of 90 care homes for older people within 5 miles, 56 are rated higher by CQC, 28 are the same and 6 are lower.

13 of these nearby homes have been inspected more recently than this one.

Based on CQC ratings, updated 22 October 2026. How we compare homes | See the nearby homes

Rating history

  1. GoodDec 2016
  2. Requires ImprovementJan 2022
  3. Requires ImprovementJan 2026

Rating dropped from Good to Requires Improvement in 2022.

Source: CQC inspection reports. Contains CQC data licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Costs and who runs this home

Run by Liverpool City Council, which runs 5 care homes in England: 1 rated Good, 3 Requires Improvement and 1 Inadequate.

Average care home fees in the North West: £882 a week for residential care and £1,196 for nursing care (2024-25 averages). Self-funders usually pay more. See our care home costs guide.

  • How to pay for a care home explains the council means test, what counts as capital and the funding you can ask to be assessed for.

About Townsend Hub

Townsend Hub is a residential care home in Liverpool offering reablement support for adults recovering from a hospital stay. Full details of the CQC's most recent findings are set out below.

Townsend Hub is a residential care home providing reablement support to adults recovering from a hospital stay, helping them regain independence and plan for their future. The CQC rated the home Requires Improvement overall, finding a breach relating to governance and record-keeping. Risk management was not always person-centred, care plans lacked detail on consent and capacity, and monitoring of conditions like diabetes and catheter care was inconsistent.

Inspectors found staff kind, caring and well regarded by residents and families, with good teamwork and joint working with outside professionals. However, some staff felt overstretched, affecting training and paperwork, and audits had not identified gaps in care planning. Leaders were approachable, but stronger oversight and learning from incidents are needed to sustain improvement.

Source: CQC assessment, 6 January 2026

Specialist Care

Older peoplePhysical disabilitiesYounger adults

Fees and availability

We have not verified a current weekly fee for this home. Ask for a written quote based on the room and care needed, including any extra charges.

Check current vacancies, the admission assessment and visiting arrangements directly with the home.

Care and inspection details

Checked against the CQC register on 21 September 2026. This is a check of published information, not a visit to the home.

Registered service
Care home service without nursing
Registered capacity
35 places — this is not a vacancy count
Registration checked
Registered · L6 0BB

Registered care categories

Caring for adults over 65 yrs; Caring for adults under 65 yrs; Physical disabilities.

These describe the registration. The home must assess whether it can meet the individual person's needs and whether a place is available.

CQC ratings in more detail

Overall rating shown by CQC: Requires Improvement.

Assessment published 6 January 2026. Assessment date recorded: 3 November 2025.

Read CQC's assessment overview

The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 6 January 2026. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.

Date of Assessment: From 27 November 2025 to 8 December 2025. The service is a residential care home providing reablement support to adults following a hospital stay.

People told us staff were kind and supportive, and we observed caring interactions that promoted dignity and respect. Staff worked well together and collaborated with external professionals to achieve good outcomes. People felt safe during transitions and were supported to maintain independence and plan for their future.

We found a breach of regulation. The provider continued to be non-compliant with regulations concerning governance and record-keeping, as further improvements were required to ensure care was consistently safe and effectively managed. Risk management was not always person-centred, and care plans lacked detail about consent and capacity. Falls mitigation strategies were generic, and monitoring of health needs such as diabetes and catheter care was inconsistent.

Staff said they knew people well, however felt this was impacted when they had to work across different floors. The service catered well for people who might otherwise experience health inequalities.

While staffing levels were sufficient, some staff felt overstretched, which affected record-keeping and training compliance. However, people did feedback that staff were kind and caring and we observed pleasant interactions.

Governance systems were not fully effective. Audits did not identify gaps in care planning, and lessons from incidents were not consistently embedded. While leaders were approachable and staff felt supported, improvements in oversight and continuous learning are required to drive sustained change.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

Safe
Requires Improvement
Effective
Requires Improvement
Caring
Good
Responsive
Requires Improvement
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Questions prompted by these ratings

  • Safe: What changes have been made to medicines, staffing and safeguarding since this rating?
  • Effective: How are staff training, nutrition and health outcomes checked now?
  • Responsive: How are care plans, activities and complaints adapted to each resident?
  • Well-led: What has changed in management, checks and oversight since this rating?

These are questions for your visit, not a claim about conditions today.

Read Townsend Hub's CQC record and reports.

Contains Care Quality Commission information under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ratings and registration details can change after the date checked.

5 Questions to Ask on Your Visit

When visiting Townsend Hub, consider asking...

  1. 1.What happens if my relative's care needs increase significantly -- will they have to move?
  2. 2.How do you handle concerns or complaints from families?
  3. 3.What does the monthly fee cover and what will cost extra?
  4. 4.How do you keep families informed about their relative's day-to-day wellbeing?
  5. 5.What happens if my relative is unhappy here?

5 Things to Look For on Your Visit

When you visit Townsend Hub, look out for...

  1. 1.Do staff greet residents by name and stop to chat?
  2. 2.Are residents dressed, up and occupied, or sitting alone in front of a TV?
  3. 3.Does the home smell fresh and feel clean without being clinical?
  4. 4.Do residents look comfortable and at ease, or anxious and withdrawn?
  5. 5.Does the manager answer your questions openly or deflect?

Could the NHS fund Townsend Hub's fees?

The average nursing home costs £1,535 per week. That's £79,820 a year. NHS Continuing Healthcare could cover all of it. No means test, no contribution from you.

Location

106 Townsend Lane, Anfield, Liverpool, L6 0BB

CQC Logo

Townsend Hub

CQC overall rating

Requires Improvement

Assessment date: 3 November 2025

View full inspection report
New

Have a question about this care home?

Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.

Share what's on your mind
07709398560