Skip to main content
Placeholder image for Roseacre
RoseacreCornwall

Illustrative image. Photographs of this home have not yet been added.

Rated:Requires ImprovementResidential

Roseacre

St Winnolls, Polbathic, Torpoint, Cornwall, PL11 3DX
01503230256
Care Type

Residential Care

Assessment date

5 November 2025

Provider

Roseacre Care Limited

Beds

22 beds

Rating history

  1. Requires ImprovementMar 2015
  2. GoodDec 2015
  3. GoodAug 2016
  4. GoodSept 2017
  5. Requires ImprovementJul 2019
  6. GoodDec 2020
  7. Requires ImprovementJan 2026

Rating dropped from Good to Requires Improvement in 2026. CQC has rated this home 7 times since 2015.

Source: CQC inspection reports. Contains CQC data licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Costs and who runs this home

This is the only care home Roseacre Care Limited runs in England.

Average care home fees in the South West: £1,170 a week for residential care and £1,472 for nursing care (2024-25 averages). Self-funders usually pay more. See our care home costs guide.

  • This home lists dementia care, which usually costs more than standard residential care. See dementia care home costs. NHS Continuing Healthcare may apply where someone's needs are primarily health needs.
  • How to pay for a care home explains the council means test, what counts as capital and the funding you can ask to be assessed for.

About Roseacre

Roseacre is a residential care home in Cornwall, providing accommodation for people living with dementia or physical disabilities. Further detail on the most recent CQC findings for the home is set out below.

Roseacre supports up to 22 people living with dementia or physical disabilities. The CQC rated the home requires improvement, a fall from its previous good rating, after finding breaches relating to safe care, recruitment, premises, person-centred care and governance. Inspectors found care plans and risk assessments were out of date, incidents were poorly recorded, and medicines management needed improvement.

Parts of the building required updating.

Staff were kind and people spoke positively about feeling safe and well cared for, with good food praised by residents and relatives. However, activities were limited, largely dependent on staff availability. New managers had begun introducing improvements at the time of the assessment.

Source: CQC assessment, 15 January 2026

Specialist Care

DementiaLearning disabilitiesMental healthOlder people

Fees and availability

We have not verified a current weekly fee for this home. Ask for a written quote based on the room and care needed, including any extra charges.

Check current vacancies, the admission assessment and visiting arrangements directly with the home.

Care and inspection details

Checked against the CQC register on 21 September 2026. This is a check of published information, not a visit to the home.

Registered service
Care home service without nursing
Registered capacity
22 places — this is not a vacancy count
Registration checked
Registered · PL11 3DX

Registered care categories

Caring for adults over 65 yrs; Dementia; Learning disabilities; Mental health conditions.

These describe the registration. The home must assess whether it can meet the individual person's needs and whether a place is available.

CQC ratings in more detail

Overall rating shown by CQC: Requires Improvement.

Assessment published 15 January 2026. Assessment date recorded: 5 November 2025.

Read CQC's assessment overview

The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 15 January 2026. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.

Dates of assessment: 12, 25 and 27 November 2025.

Roseacre provides support for up to 22 people who may be living with dementia or a physical disability. At the time of our inspection 17 people were living at the service.

At our last inspection, this service was rated good. At this inspection we found breaches in regulations relating to person-centred care, safe care and treatment, premises, recruitment and good governance. The rating has changed from good to requires improvement.

Incidents were not consistently recorded and there was no oversight of accidents and incidents to enable managers to identify patterns. Care plans were out of date and risk assessments did not guide staff on how to support people when they were distressed or anxious. Systems for safe recruitment had not always been followed. Improvements were required to the way medicines were managed. Areas of the premises needed updating and redecorating.

There were enough staff to support people during the day. An additional member of staff had been added to the rota to support people at lunch time. There were no records available to evidence staff training had taken place, although staff told us they had completed medicine training and there had been a recent moving and handling training session.

People had enough to eat and drink. They were supported to access other healthcare agencies when needed. New managers were in post and had identified areas for improvement. They were working to develop, introduce and embed new systems to help ensure people were supported safely, their health needs were monitored and any concerns quickly escalated.

We identified breaches in relation to person-centred care, safe care and treatment, premises, governance of the service and safe recruitment.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

Safe
Requires Improvement
Effective
Requires Improvement
Caring
Good
Responsive
Requires Improvement
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Questions prompted by these ratings

  • Safe: What changes have been made to medicines, staffing and safeguarding since this rating?
  • Effective: How are staff training, nutrition and health outcomes checked now?
  • Responsive: How are care plans, activities and complaints adapted to each resident?
  • Well-led: What has changed in management, checks and oversight since this rating?

These are questions for your visit, not a claim about conditions today.

Read Roseacre's CQC record and reports.

Contains Care Quality Commission information under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ratings and registration details can change after the date checked.

5 Questions to Ask on Your Visit

When visiting Roseacre, consider asking...

  1. 1.What specific dementia training do staff receive and how recently?
  2. 2.How do you support a resident who becomes distressed or confused?
  3. 3.How does the home keep a record of a resident's life history and personal preferences?
  4. 4.How do you involve families as dementia progresses and communication becomes harder?
  5. 5.What happens when a resident's dementia reaches an advanced stage?

5 Things to Look For on Your Visit

When you visit Roseacre, look out for...

  1. 1.Is the environment calm, uncluttered and easy to navigate?
  2. 2.Do staff speak to residents with patience and dignity, even if they repeat themselves?
  3. 3.Are there memory cues around the home -- photos, familiar objects, clear signage?
  4. 4.Do residents seem settled and safe, or agitated and unsupervised?
  5. 5.Is there meaningful activity happening, or are residents just sitting quietly with nothing to do?

Could the NHS fund Roseacre's fees?

The average nursing home costs £1,535 per week. That's £79,820 a year. NHS Continuing Healthcare could cover all of it. No means test, no contribution from you.

Location

St Winnolls, Polbathic, Torpoint, Cornwall, PL11 3DX

CQC Logo

Roseacre

CQC overall rating

Requires Improvement

Assessment date: 5 November 2025

View full inspection report
New

Have a question about this care home?

Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.

Share what's on your mind
01503230256