
Illustrative image. Photographs of this home have not yet been added.
OSJCT Ermine House
Residential Care
7 January 2025
The Orders Of St. John Care Trust
45 beds
How this home compares nearby
Of 30 care homes for older people within 5 miles, 22 are rated higher by CQC, 8 are the same and none are lower.
7 of these nearby homes have been inspected more recently than this one.
Based on CQC ratings, updated 21 October 2026. How we compare homes | See the nearby homes
Rating history
- May 2015
- Jun 2018
- Mar 2025
Rating dropped from Good to Requires Improvement in 2025.
Source: CQC inspection reports. Contains CQC data licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Costs and who runs this home
Run by The Orders Of St. John Care Trust, which runs 61 care homes in England: 4 rated Outstanding, 48 Good, 5 Requires Improvement and 4 not yet rated.
Average care home fees in the East Midlands: £958 a week for residential care and £1,250 for nursing care (2024-25 averages). Self-funders usually pay more. See our care home costs guide.
- How to pay for a care home explains the council means test, what counts as capital and the funding you can ask to be assessed for.
About OSJCT Ermine House
OSJCT Ermine House is a residential care home in Lincolnshire, providing personal care and support for older people. Details of the most recent CQC inspection findings are set out below.
OSJCT Ermine House provides personal care and support for older people, including those with health conditions such as diabetes. The CQC rated the service Requires Improvement overall, finding gaps in infection control, with some equipment worn or unclean, and environmental risks such as unassessed windows. Medicine care plans, including guidance for insulin management, lacked sufficient detail, and governance systems had not caught these shortfalls.
Inspectors found staff were kind, attentive and knew people well, with relatives largely positive about the care provided. Recruitment, training and safeguarding practices were sound. However, the CQC found breaches of regulations relating to safe care and treatment and good governance, and told the provider it must improve.
Source: CQC assessment, 26 March 2025
Specialist Care
Fees and availability
We have not verified a current weekly fee for this home. Ask for a written quote based on the room and care needed, including any extra charges.
Check current vacancies, the admission assessment and visiting arrangements directly with the home.
Care and inspection details
Checked against the CQC register on 21 September 2026. This is a check of published information, not a visit to the home.
- Registered service
- Care home service without nursing
- Registered capacity
- 45 places — this is not a vacancy count
- Registration checked
- Registered · LN2 2EX
Registered care categories
Caring for adults over 65 yrs.
These describe the registration. The home must assess whether it can meet the individual person's needs and whether a place is available.
CQC ratings in more detail
Overall rating shown by CQC: .
Assessment published 26 March 2025. Assessment date recorded: 7 January 2025.
Read CQC's assessment overview
The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 26 March 2025. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.
Date of assessment: 14 January to 14 February 2025. The provider did not always assess or manage the risk of infection. We observed some equipment was rusty and worn and could not be effectively cleaned. Some pressure relieving equipment was seen to be unclean with ripped protective covers. Environmental risks had not always been identified. Smaller windows on the ground and first floor had not been effectively risk assessed to ensure there was not a risk to people who could potentially climb out or fall from height. Some people’s medicine care plans contained very limited or no information. Care plans did not contain sufficient information for people who required insulin to manage their diabetes. The registered manager told us these were updated following feedback to ensure all relevant information was included. There were clear governance procedures in place however these had not always been effective. For example, records were not always completed, and this had not been highlighted in audits. This meant it was not always clear if people had been supported in line with their care and support needs or that their health needs had been met. Care plans gave guidance to staff on how they were to promote people’s independence and enable them to have choice and control over their own care and support. However, some care plans did not make it clear how people needed to be supported, and daily notes did not evidence that staff were supporting people in line with their assessed needs. Recruitment procedures for staff were safe and robust. Staff received training that was suitable for their role. Staff were positive about the training they had received. Safeguarding procedures were in place and robust. Staff had a good understanding of safeguarding and knew how to raise concerns if they needed to. The provider was in breach of 2 legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment and good governance.
- Safe
- Effective
- Caring
- Responsive
- Well-led
Questions prompted by these ratings
- Safe: What changes have been made to medicines, staffing and safeguarding since this rating?
- Well-led: What has changed in management, checks and oversight since this rating?
These are questions for your visit, not a claim about conditions today.
Contains Care Quality Commission information under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ratings and registration details can change after the date checked.
5 Questions to Ask on Your Visit
When visiting OSJCT Ermine House, consider asking...
- 1.What happens if my relative's care needs increase significantly -- will they have to move?
- 2.How do you handle concerns or complaints from families?
- 3.What does the monthly fee cover and what will cost extra?
- 4.How do you keep families informed about their relative's day-to-day wellbeing?
- 5.What happens if my relative is unhappy here?
5 Things to Look For on Your Visit
When you visit OSJCT Ermine House, look out for...
- 1.Do staff greet residents by name and stop to chat?
- 2.Are residents dressed, up and occupied, or sitting alone in front of a TV?
- 3.Does the home smell fresh and feel clean without being clinical?
- 4.Do residents look comfortable and at ease, or anxious and withdrawn?
- 5.Does the manager answer your questions openly or deflect?
Could the NHS fund OSJCT Ermine House's fees?
The average nursing home costs £1,535 per week. That's £79,820 a year. NHS Continuing Healthcare could cover all of it. No means test, no contribution from you.
Location
Laughton Way, Ermine Estate, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN2 2EX

OSJCT Ermine House
CQC overall rating
Assessment date: 7 January 2025
Helpful Guides
Have a question about this care home?
Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.
Share what's on your mindFind Out If OSJCT Ermine House Is Right for You
Start the conversation and request a callback from this home.
A free daily companion for someone with dementia
Shows the date, weather, family photos, and a daily question. Set up in 10 minutes.
Other Care Homes Near LN2 2EX
Listings with similar recorded care types and specialisms are shown first. Confirm care needs and availability directly with each home.

Ruckland Court
1 Ruckland Court, Ruckland Avenue, Lincoln, Lincolnshire
Residential care
0.4 miles away (straight-line distance)

The Laurels
Sheridan Close, Lincoln, Lincolnshire
Residential care
0.8 miles away (straight-line distance)

Ridgeway Care Centre
2-6 The Avenue, Lincoln, Lincolnshire
Residential care
1.2 miles away (straight-line distance)

Roman Wharf Care Home
1 Roman Wharf, Lincoln
Residential care
1.4 miles away (straight-line distance)

Monson Retirement Home
9-11 Monson Street, Lincoln, Lincolnshire
Residential care
1.7 miles away (straight-line distance)

Canwick Court Care Centre
78 South Park, Lincoln, Lincolnshire
Residential care
2.0 miles away (straight-line distance)