Skip to main content
Placeholder image for Melford Court Care Home
Melford Court Care HomeSuffolk

Illustrative image. Photographs of this home have not yet been added.

Rated:GoodNursing

Melford Court Care Home

Hall Street, Long Melford, Sudbury, Suffolk, CO10 9JA
01787880545
Care Type

Nursing Care

Assessment date

26 January 2026

Provider

Stow Healthcare Group Limited

Beds

52 beds

About Melford Court Care Home

Melford Court Care Home is a nursing home located in Suffolk, East of England. Its registered care categories include dementia and older people. The home has 52 beds. CQC records an overall rating of Good, published in May 2026. The home is operated by Stow Healthcare Group Limited.

Specialist Care

DementiaOlder people

Fees and availability

We have not verified a current weekly fee for this home. Ask for a written quote based on the room and care needed, including any extra charges.

Check current vacancies, the admission assessment and visiting arrangements directly with the home.

Care and inspection details

Checked against the CQC register on 21 September 2026. This is a check of published information, not a visit to the home.

Registered service
Care home service with nursing
Registered capacity
52 places — this is not a vacancy count
Registration checked
Registered · CO10 9JA

Registered care categories

Caring for adults over 65 yrs; Dementia.

These describe the registration. The home must assess whether it can meet the individual person's needs and whether a place is available.

CQC ratings in more detail

Overall rating shown by CQC: Good.

Assessment published 7 May 2026. Assessment date recorded: 26 January 2026.

Read CQC's assessment overview

The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 7 May 2026. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.

Date of inspection: 24 February 2026 until 25 March 2026.

Melford Court Care Home is a nursing and residential service providing care for older people, including those living with dementia. At this inspection, we found the service continued to deliver safe, effective, compassionate and responsive care.

People’s safety and well-being were prioritised and risks to people were generally well managed, with safeguarding systems embedded and staff demonstrating strong awareness of how to recognise and respond to concerns. People told us they felt safe living at the service and were confident in staff. Incidents were appropriately reported, investigated and reviewed, with learning shared to prevent recurrence. Where gaps in care documentation were identified, these had not resulted in harm and were already being addressed by the registered manager through strengthened oversight and review processes.

Care was effective and delivered in line with people’s assessed needs and best practice guidance. People received timely access to healthcare professionals and staff worked collaboratively with external services to promote positive outcomes.

Staff were trained, skilled and supported through supervision and development, enabling them to deliver consistently effective care.

The service was caring, people were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Relationships between staff and people were warm and compassionate, and staff took time to engage meaningfully with people.

Care was responsive and highly personalised. People experienced a wide range of meaningful activities tailored to their interests and abilities, including strong community engagement and individualised one-to-one support. The service demonstrated outstanding practice in end‑of‑life care, providing holistic support to people and their families in partnership with healthcare professionals.

The service was well led, with visible and approachable leadership promoting an open, inclusive and learning‑focused culture. Governance systems supported oversight of quality and safety, and leaders responded appropriately when improvements were needed. Staff felt supported and valued, contributing to a stable workforce and positive culture focused on delivering high‑quality, person‑centred care.

Safe
Good
Effective
Good
Caring
Good
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Good

Read Melford Court Care Home's CQC record and reports.

Contains Care Quality Commission information under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ratings and registration details can change after the date checked.

5 Questions to Ask on Your Visit

When visiting Melford Court Care Home, consider asking...

  1. 1.What specific dementia training do staff receive and how recently?
  2. 2.How do you support a resident who becomes distressed or confused?
  3. 3.How does the home keep a record of a resident's life history and personal preferences?
  4. 4.How do you involve families as dementia progresses and communication becomes harder?
  5. 5.What happens when a resident's dementia reaches an advanced stage?

5 Things to Look For on Your Visit

When you visit Melford Court Care Home, look out for...

  1. 1.Is the environment calm, uncluttered and easy to navigate?
  2. 2.Do staff speak to residents with patience and dignity, even if they repeat themselves?
  3. 3.Are there memory cues around the home -- photos, familiar objects, clear signage?
  4. 4.Do residents seem settled and safe, or agitated and unsupervised?
  5. 5.Is there meaningful activity happening, or are residents just sitting quietly with nothing to do?

Could the NHS fund Melford Court Care Home's fees?

The average nursing home costs £1,535 per week. That's £79,820 a year. NHS Continuing Healthcare could cover all of it. No means test, no contribution from you.

Location

Hall Street, Long Melford, Sudbury, Suffolk, CO10 9JA

CQC Logo

Melford Court Care Home

CQC overall rating

Good

Assessment date: 26 January 2026

View full inspection report
New

Have a question about this care home?

Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.

Share what's on your mind
01787880545