Skip to main content
Placeholder image for Rosecroft Residential Home
Rosecroft Residential HomeCumberland

Illustrative image. Photographs of this home have not yet been added.

Rated:Requires ImprovementResidential

Rosecroft Residential Home

Westfield Drive, Workington, CA14 5AR
01900604814
Care Type

Residential Care

Assessment date

13 May 2026

Provider

Stilecroft (MPS) Limited

Beds

51 beds

How this home compares nearby

Of 10 care homes for older people within 5 miles, none are rated higher by CQC, 7 are the same and 3 are lower.

10 of these nearby homes have been inspected more recently than this one.

Based on CQC ratings, updated 21 October 2026. How we compare homes | See the nearby homes

Costs and who runs this home

Run by Stilecroft (MPS) Limited, which runs 2 care homes in England: 1 rated Good and 1 Requires Improvement.

Average care home fees in the North West: £882 a week for residential care and £1,196 for nursing care (2024-25 averages). Self-funders usually pay more. See our care home costs guide.

  • This home lists dementia care, which usually costs more than standard residential care. See dementia care home costs. NHS Continuing Healthcare may apply where someone's needs are primarily health needs.
  • How to pay for a care home explains the council means test, what counts as capital and the funding you can ask to be assessed for.

About Rosecroft Residential Home

Rosecroft Residential Home is a residential care home located in Cumberland, North West. Its registered care categories include dementia, mental health, and older people. The home has 51 beds. CQC records an overall rating of Requires Improvement, published in July 2026. The home is operated by Stilecroft (MPS) Limited.

Specialist Care

DementiaMental healthOlder people

Fees and availability

We have not verified a current weekly fee for this home. Ask for a written quote based on the room and care needed, including any extra charges.

Check current vacancies, the admission assessment and visiting arrangements directly with the home.

Care and inspection details

Checked against the CQC register on 21 September 2026. This is a check of published information, not a visit to the home.

Registered service
Care home service without nursing
Registered capacity
51 places — this is not a vacancy count
Registration checked
Registered · CA14 5AR

Registered care categories

Caring for adults over 65 yrs; Dementia; Mental health conditions.

These describe the registration. The home must assess whether it can meet the individual person's needs and whether a place is available.

CQC ratings in more detail

Overall rating shown by CQC: Requires Improvement.

Assessment published 20 July 2026. Assessment date recorded: 13 May 2026.

Read CQC's assessment overview

The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 20 July 2026. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.

Date of Assessment: 03 June 2026 to 11 June 2026. Rosecroft Residential Home is a residential care home that provides care and accommodation for up to 51 older people, some of whom are living with dementia or requiring support with their mental health.

‘Right support, right care, right culture' is the statutory guidance which supports CQC to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people. We considered this guidance as there were people using the service who have a learning disability and/or who are autistic.

We assessed the quality statements from the key questions of safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led.

We found breaches of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, and good governance. The service did not always ensure the risks in the home environment were identified and acted on. Medicines were not always managed safely. The systems in place to assess and manage the quality and safety of the service were not always effective.

A lack of information or inconsistent information in people’s care plans and risk assessments meant there was a risk people would not experience a seamless transition between different services. Although we observed people being supported to manage their risks safely, these risks were not always recorded effectively in their care plans or risk assessments. However, the service identified and investigated concerns about safety and took action to keep people safe; and safeguarding procedures were followed where required. The service made sure there were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff who worked together well to provide care that met people’s individual needs. The service assessed and managed the risk of infection.

People’s care was delivered in line with national standards or evidence-based good practice guidance. The service worked well across teams and services to support people. People were referred to health and social care partners for specialist support, where required. Systems were in place to monitor people’s care and treatment. However, records were not always completed consistently. People’s assessments did not always include up to date, consistent information about people’s needs. The service did not always ensure the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 had been followed.

Staff treated people with kindness and respected them as individuals. Staff promoted people’s independence and people could take part in a variety of activities. Staff responded to people’s needs in the moment and acted to minimise any discomfort, concern or distress. Staff felt well supported by a dedicated registered manager and the management team who prioritised their wellbeing.

The service worked closely with a range of other agencies including GP practices. The service supplied appropriate, accurate and up-to-date information in formats that were tailored to individual needs. The service made it easy for people to share feedback and ideas, or raise complaints about their care, treatment and support. People could access care and treatment when they needed it. Staff and managers expressed a commitment to ensuring people did not face discrimination and had equal opportunities within and outside the home. However, people’s care plans did not always include person centred information about their care preferences, goals and aspirations or end of life preferences.

The service had a shared vision, strategy and culture. Staff felt the management team were approachable, inclusive and supportive; and felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard. The service valued diversity in their workforce. The service shared information and learning with partners and collaborated for improvement. The provider’s leadership team worked well together with a focus on delivering good care and improving systems.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

Safe
Requires Improvement
Effective
Good
Caring
Good
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Questions prompted by these ratings

  • Safe: What changes have been made to medicines, staffing and safeguarding since this rating?
  • Well-led: What has changed in management, checks and oversight since this rating?

These are questions for your visit, not a claim about conditions today.

Read Rosecroft Residential Home's CQC record and reports.

Contains Care Quality Commission information under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ratings and registration details can change after the date checked.

5 Questions to Ask on Your Visit

When visiting Rosecroft Residential Home, consider asking...

  1. 1.What specific dementia training do staff receive and how recently?
  2. 2.How do you support a resident who becomes distressed or confused?
  3. 3.How does the home keep a record of a resident's life history and personal preferences?
  4. 4.How do you involve families as dementia progresses and communication becomes harder?
  5. 5.What happens when a resident's dementia reaches an advanced stage?

5 Things to Look For on Your Visit

When you visit Rosecroft Residential Home, look out for...

  1. 1.Is the environment calm, uncluttered and easy to navigate?
  2. 2.Do staff speak to residents with patience and dignity, even if they repeat themselves?
  3. 3.Are there memory cues around the home -- photos, familiar objects, clear signage?
  4. 4.Do residents seem settled and safe, or agitated and unsupervised?
  5. 5.Is there meaningful activity happening, or are residents just sitting quietly with nothing to do?

Could the NHS fund Rosecroft Residential Home's fees?

The average nursing home costs £1,535 per week. That's £79,820 a year. NHS Continuing Healthcare could cover all of it. No means test, no contribution from you.

Location

Westfield Drive, Workington, CA14 5AR

CQC Logo

Rosecroft Residential Home

CQC overall rating

Requires Improvement

Assessment date: 13 May 2026

View full inspection report
New

Have a question about this care home?

Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.

Share what's on your mind
01900604814