
Illustrative image. Photographs of this home have not yet been added.
Red House - Care Home
Residential Care
8 April 2026
H I C A
48 beds
About Red House - Care Home
Red House - Care Home is a residential care home located in East Riding of Yorkshire, Yorkshire and The Humber. Its registered care categories include dementia, older people, and younger adults. The home has 48 beds. CQC records an overall rating of Good, published in June 2026. The home is operated by H I C A.
Specialist Care
Fees and availability
We have not verified a current weekly fee for this home. Ask for a written quote based on the room and care needed, including any extra charges.
Check current vacancies, the admission assessment and visiting arrangements directly with the home.
Care and inspection details
Checked against the CQC register on 21 September 2026. This is a check of published information, not a visit to the home.
- Registered service
- Care home service without nursing
- Registered capacity
- 48 places — this is not a vacancy count
- Registration checked
- Registered · YO15 2JB
Registered care categories
Caring for adults over 65 yrs; Caring for adults under 65 yrs; Dementia.
These describe the registration. The home must assess whether it can meet the individual person's needs and whether a place is available.
CQC ratings in more detail
Overall rating shown by CQC: .
Assessment published 12 June 2026. Assessment date recorded: 8 April 2026.
Read CQC's assessment overview
The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 12 June 2026. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.
Red House – Care Home provides accommodation and personal care to up to 48 older people, many of whom live with dementia. There were 44 people using the service at the time of the inspection.
This is service is for older people, including those living with dementia.
We carried out this assessment on 19, 20 and 21 May 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
People were protected from avoidable harm through a positive learning culture, effective safeguarding arrangements and robust risk management systems. Staff understood their safeguarding responsibilities and were confident in recognising and reporting concerns. Incidents were reported, analysed and used to support learning and improvement. Risks to people’s safety and health were assessed and managed, with learning from incidents and accidents shared through established systems to reduce future risk. Medicines were managed safely, supported by audits and oversight. Staff were recruited safely and received training, supervision and support to carry out their roles effectively. There were enough suitably skilled and experienced staff to meet people’s needs safely, and staff described good teamwork and support from leaders.
The environment was clean and well maintained, with appropriate safety checks in place. However, there were examples where further development would improve support for people with advanced dementia. We discussed this with the registered manager who told us plans were already in place.
Care was effective and based on detailed assessments, evidence‑based guidance and regular monitoring of people’s health and wellbeing. People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives. People had consented to their care and aspects of their support. However, consent documentation was not always consistently saved within the electronic care planning system. We brought this to the attention of the registered manager and were assured this oversight would be rectified.
The service was well led, with clear governance systems, visible leadership and a culture that promoted openness, learning and continuous improvement. Leaders had good oversight of quality and safety and used audits, feedback and analysis of incidents to drive improvement. Overall, Red House was a caring, stable and well‑managed service where people experienced kind, respectful and person‑centred care, delivered by staff who knew them well and were supported by effective leadership.
- Safe
- Effective
- Caring
- Responsive
- Well-led
Contains Care Quality Commission information under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ratings and registration details can change after the date checked.
5 Questions to Ask on Your Visit
When visiting Red House - Care Home, consider asking...
- 1.What specific dementia training do staff receive and how recently?
- 2.How do you support a resident who becomes distressed or confused?
- 3.How does the home keep a record of a resident's life history and personal preferences?
- 4.How do you involve families as dementia progresses and communication becomes harder?
- 5.What happens when a resident's dementia reaches an advanced stage?
5 Things to Look For on Your Visit
When you visit Red House - Care Home, look out for...
- 1.Is the environment calm, uncluttered and easy to navigate?
- 2.Do staff speak to residents with patience and dignity, even if they repeat themselves?
- 3.Are there memory cues around the home -- photos, familiar objects, clear signage?
- 4.Do residents seem settled and safe, or agitated and unsupervised?
- 5.Is there meaningful activity happening, or are residents just sitting quietly with nothing to do?
Could the NHS fund Red House - Care Home's fees?
The average nursing home costs £1,535 per week. That's £79,820 a year. NHS Continuing Healthcare could cover all of it. No means test, no contribution from you.
Location
St Annes Road, Bridlington, Humberside, YO15 2JB

Red House - Care Home
CQC overall rating
Assessment date: 8 April 2026
Helpful Guides
Have a question about this care home?
Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.
Share what's on your mindFind Out If Red House - Care Home Is Right for You
Start the conversation and request a callback from this home.
A free daily companion for someone with dementia
Shows the date, weather, family photos, and a daily question. Set up in 10 minutes.
Other Care Homes Near YO15 2JB
Listings with similar recorded care types and specialisms are shown first. Confirm care needs and availability directly with each home.

White Rose Lodge
Lime Kiln Lane, Bridlington, North Humberside
Residential care
0.4 miles away (straight-line distance)

Aalia Health Care Limited
Aalia House, 66-72, Marshall Avenue, Bridlington
Residential care
0.4 miles away (straight-line distance)

Lucy Lodge
39-41 Victoria Road, Bridlington, North Humberside
Residential care
0.5 miles away (straight-line distance)

Belgrave Court Residential Care Home
12-16 Belgrave Road, Bridlington, North Humberside
Residential care
1.0 miles away (straight-line distance)

Rosegarth Residential
30-32 Belgrave Drive, Bridlington, Humberside
Residential care
1.0 miles away (straight-line distance)

Bridlington
Putney House, 47 Scarborough Road, Bridlington, North Humberside
Residential care
1.1 miles away (straight-line distance)