Skip to main content
Placeholder image for Parkgate Manor
Parkgate ManorEast Sussex

Illustrative image. Photographs of this home have not yet been added.

Rated:Requires ImprovementResidential

Parkgate Manor

Main Road, Catsfield, Battle, East Sussex, TN33 9DT
01424773251
Care Type

Residential Care

Assessment date

10 June 2025

Provider

Parkgate Manor

Beds

40 beds

Rating history

  1. Requires ImprovementJun 2015
  2. GoodSept 2016
  3. Requires ImprovementJul 2019
  4. Requires ImprovementAug 2021
  5. InadequateMar 2022
  6. Requires ImprovementDec 2022
  7. Requires ImprovementSept 2025

Improved from Inadequate to Requires Improvement in 2022. CQC has rated this home 7 times since 2015.

Source: CQC inspection reports. Contains CQC data licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Costs and who runs this home

This is the only care home Parkgate Manor runs in England.

  • How to pay for a care home explains the council means test, what counts as capital and the funding you can ask to be assessed for.

About Parkgate Manor

Parkgate Manor is a residential care home in East Sussex, providing support for autistic people and people with a learning disability. Details of the CQC's most recent findings are set out below.

Parkgate Manor is a residential care home supporting up to 40 autistic people and people with a learning disability. At the time of the assessment, 24 people were living there. The CQC found staff to be kind and caring, with people treated with dignity and good access to health professionals, though not all activities were suited to individual needs and feedback from people and relatives was not consistently sought.

Inspectors found ongoing governance failings, with the provider in breach of regulations relating to quality assurance, medicines management, infection control and safety checks. There had been no registered manager for 14 months, and leadership turnover had weakened oversight. Improvements made previously had not been sustained, and the CQC has told the provider it must improve.

Source: CQC assessment, 29 September 2025

Specialist Care

Learning disabilities

Fees and availability

We have not verified a current weekly fee for this home. Ask for a written quote based on the room and care needed, including any extra charges.

Check current vacancies, the admission assessment and visiting arrangements directly with the home.

Care and inspection details

Checked against the CQC register on 21 September 2026. This is a check of published information, not a visit to the home.

Registered service
Care home service without nursing
Registered capacity
40 places — this is not a vacancy count
Registration checked
Registered · TN33 9DT

Registered care categories

Learning disabilities.

These describe the registration. The home must assess whether it can meet the individual person's needs and whether a place is available.

CQC ratings in more detail

Overall rating shown by CQC: Requires Improvement.

Assessment published 29 September 2025. Assessment date recorded: 10 June 2025.

Read CQC's assessment overview

The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 29 September 2025. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.

This assessment was carried out between the 24 June to 15 July 2025. The service was previously rated requires improvement with 3 breaches of legal regulations in December 2022. This assessment was undertaken to follow up on whether these breaches had been met.The service is a residential care home providing support to autistic people and people with a learning disability. The service is registered to accommodate up to 40 people. At the time of our assessment there were 24 people living at the service.

At the last assessment, the provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to people’s health appointments and some staff practices were institutional. Improvements were found during this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations. However, whilst improvements were made in relation to care planning, further oversight is needed to ensure records are continually reviewed and updated as needed.

The provider had also previously been in breach of the legal regulation in relation to concerns identified around some quality assurance processes, a lack of audits in relation to care plans, seeking feedback from people, relatives and staff, supervision of staff and compliance for right support, right care, right culture guidance. The provider has been continuously in breach of regulation in respect of governance since August 2021. Whilst some improvements were made, these were not sustained, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation. In addition, we found further shortfalls in relation to infection prevention and control, management of medicines, cleaning schedules and health and safety checks that indicated there was not effective oversight of these areas. The manager confirmed in writing and provided evidence of the actions taken to address the shortfalls. Progress made now needs to be sustained and embedded.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ (RSRCRC) guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Whilst we found staff were caring, offered people choices, and treated people with dignity, the systems in place did not demonstrate that people’s voice was always heard and acted upon.

The model of care was not in line with current best practice guidance, RSRCRC. The service is larger than best practice guidelines. This was because the service was operating before the guidance was released. The provider was aware of this and although progress was being made to improve outcomes to meet the principles of RSRCRC, further work was needed to demonstrate more clearly how this was being achieved and would be developed further.

There had been no registered manager for 14 months. The managing director had previously been the registered manager and knew people, staff and the service well. (They are referred to throughout this report as the manager.) There had been inconsistent leadership due to a turnover of registered managers. This meant quality assurance and monitoring systems had not been sustained.

We observed that the service provided kind and compassionate care, and staff knew people and their needs well. The provider worked in partnership with external health and social care professionals to ensure good outcomes for people. Professionals spoke highly of staff at Parkgate Manor. Although staff had not received formal supervision, they spoke positively about working at the service and felt well supported.

There were good training opportunities available to staff. All staff had opportunities to attend face to face specialist training to meet the needs of people living at Parkgate Manor. Management at Parkgate Manor knew the service, people, and staff well.

Safe
Requires Improvement
Effective
Good
Caring
Good
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Questions prompted by these ratings

  • Safe: What changes have been made to medicines, staffing and safeguarding since this rating?
  • Well-led: What has changed in management, checks and oversight since this rating?

These are questions for your visit, not a claim about conditions today.

Read Parkgate Manor's CQC record and reports.

Contains Care Quality Commission information under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ratings and registration details can change after the date checked.

5 Questions to Ask on Your Visit

When visiting Parkgate Manor, consider asking...

  1. 1.What happens if my relative's care needs increase significantly -- will they have to move?
  2. 2.How do you handle concerns or complaints from families?
  3. 3.What does the monthly fee cover and what will cost extra?
  4. 4.How do you keep families informed about their relative's day-to-day wellbeing?
  5. 5.What happens if my relative is unhappy here?

5 Things to Look For on Your Visit

When you visit Parkgate Manor, look out for...

  1. 1.Do staff greet residents by name and stop to chat?
  2. 2.Are residents dressed, up and occupied, or sitting alone in front of a TV?
  3. 3.Does the home smell fresh and feel clean without being clinical?
  4. 4.Do residents look comfortable and at ease, or anxious and withdrawn?
  5. 5.Does the manager answer your questions openly or deflect?

Could the NHS fund Parkgate Manor's fees?

The average nursing home costs £1,535 per week. That's £79,820 a year. NHS Continuing Healthcare could cover all of it. No means test, no contribution from you.

Location

Main Road, Catsfield, Battle, East Sussex, TN33 9DT

CQC Logo

Parkgate Manor

CQC overall rating

Requires Improvement

Assessment date: 10 June 2025

View full inspection report
New

Have a question about this care home?

Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.

Share what's on your mind
01424773251