Skip to main content
Placeholder image for Richard House Care Home
Richard House Care HomeLincolnshire

Illustrative image. Photographs of this home have not yet been added.

Rated:Requires ImprovementResidential & Nursing

Richard House Care Home

Gorse Road, Grantham, Lincolnshire, NG31 9LH
Care Type

Residential & Nursing Care

Assessment date

12 March 2026

Provider

Tanglewood Project Company No. 3 Limited

Beds

68 beds

How this home compares nearby

Of 7 care homes for older people within 5 miles, 5 are rated higher by CQC, 2 are the same and none are lower.

None of these nearby homes has been inspected more recently than this one.

Based on CQC ratings, updated 22 October 2026. How we compare homes | See the nearby homes

Rating history

  1. Requires ImprovementMay 2026

First inspected by CQC in 2026, rated Requires Improvement.

Source: CQC inspection reports. Contains CQC data licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Costs and who runs this home

This is the only care home Tanglewood Project Company No. 3 Limited runs in England.

Average care home fees in the East Midlands: £958 a week for residential care and £1,250 for nursing care (2024-25 averages). Self-funders usually pay more. See our care home costs guide.

  • NHS-funded Nursing Care pays £267.68 a week to the home towards registered nursing care for eligible residents (2026/27). A quoted fee may already exclude it.
  • This home lists dementia care, which usually costs more than standard residential care. See dementia care home costs. NHS Continuing Healthcare may apply where someone's needs are primarily health needs.
  • How to pay for a care home explains the council means test, what counts as capital and the funding you can ask to be assessed for.

About Richard House Care Home

Richard House Care Home in Lincolnshire provides personal care and support for older people. The CQC rated the service Requires Improvement overall, finding that weaknesses in care planning and risk management left people exposed to avoidable harm, with medicines not always managed safely and some doses missed or delayed.

Inspectors found that governance and leadership lacked the stability needed to drive improvement, and staffing pressures affected consistency of care. Relatives reported delays in support and limited involvement in decisions, though some staff were described as kind. The provider was in breach of regulations relating to safe care and good governance, and had only begun to address the concerns identified.

Source: CQC assessment, 29 May 2026

Specialist Care

DementiaMental healthOlder peoplePhysical disabilitiesSensory impairmentsYounger adults

Fees and availability

We have not verified a current weekly fee for this home. Ask for a written quote based on the room and care needed, including any extra charges.

Check current vacancies, the admission assessment and visiting arrangements directly with the home.

Care and inspection details

Checked against the CQC register on 21 September 2026. This is a check of published information, not a visit to the home.

Registered service
Care home service with nursing
Registered capacity
68 places — this is not a vacancy count
Registration checked
Registered · NG31 9LH

Registered care categories

Caring for adults over 65 yrs; Caring for adults under 65 yrs; Dementia; Mental health conditions; Physical disabilities; Sensory impairment.

These describe the registration. The home must assess whether it can meet the individual person's needs and whether a place is available.

CQC ratings in more detail

Overall rating shown by CQC: Requires Improvement.

Assessment published 29 May 2026. Assessment date recorded: 12 March 2026.

Read CQC's assessment overview

The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 29 May 2026. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.

Date of assessment: 15 April to 7 May 2026

This inspection was undertaken in response to identified risks arising from individual cases and emerging patterns of concern. The findings identified during the inspection highlighted further areas of risk, requiring an expanded and more detailed review.

The service was not providing consistently good care. Weaknesses in care planning and risk management meant people were exposed to avoidable harm, as changes in need were not always identified or acted on promptly.

Medicines were not always managed safely, with records showing missed doses, delays in administering time‑critical medicines which increased the risk of harm.

Systems intended to monitor quality and safety were in place but were not used effectively to highlight concerns or trigger timely action. As a result, learning from incidents, audits and feedback did not consistently lead to improvement. Leadership and governance arrangements lacked stability and effective oversight, which limited accountability when issues were identified.

Staffing pressures further affected the service’s ability to deliver safe and consistent care, and staff were not always supported through effective supervision or development.

Although the provider had begun to take steps to address leadership, governance and workforce concerns, these actions were at an early stage and had not yet resulted in sustained improvement at the time of inspection.

The provider was in breach of the legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment and good governance.

Safe
Requires Improvement
Effective
Requires Improvement
Caring
Requires Improvement
Responsive
Requires Improvement
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Questions prompted by these ratings

  • Safe: What changes have been made to medicines, staffing and safeguarding since this rating?
  • Effective: How are staff training, nutrition and health outcomes checked now?
  • Caring: How do staff protect privacy, dignity and each person’s choices?
  • Responsive: How are care plans, activities and complaints adapted to each resident?
  • Well-led: What has changed in management, checks and oversight since this rating?

These are questions for your visit, not a claim about conditions today.

Read Richard House Care Home's CQC record and reports.

Contains Care Quality Commission information under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ratings and registration details can change after the date checked.

5 Questions to Ask on Your Visit

When visiting Richard House Care Home, consider asking...

  1. 1.What specific dementia training do staff receive and how recently?
  2. 2.How do you support a resident who becomes distressed or confused?
  3. 3.How does the home keep a record of a resident's life history and personal preferences?
  4. 4.How do you involve families as dementia progresses and communication becomes harder?
  5. 5.What happens when a resident's dementia reaches an advanced stage?

5 Things to Look For on Your Visit

When you visit Richard House Care Home, look out for...

  1. 1.Is the environment calm, uncluttered and easy to navigate?
  2. 2.Do staff speak to residents with patience and dignity, even if they repeat themselves?
  3. 3.Are there memory cues around the home -- photos, familiar objects, clear signage?
  4. 4.Do residents seem settled and safe, or agitated and unsupervised?
  5. 5.Is there meaningful activity happening, or are residents just sitting quietly with nothing to do?

Could the NHS fund Richard House Care Home's fees?

The average nursing home costs £1,535 per week. That's £79,820 a year. NHS Continuing Healthcare could cover all of it. No means test, no contribution from you.

Location

Gorse Road, Grantham, Lincolnshire, NG31 9LH

CQC Logo

Richard House Care Home

CQC overall rating

Requires Improvement

Assessment date: 12 March 2026

View full inspection report
New

Have a question about this care home?

Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.

Share what's on your mind