Skip to main content
Placeholder image for Herewards House
Herewards HouseWindsor and Maidenhead

Illustrative image. Photographs of this home have not yet been added.

Rated:Requires ImprovementResidential

Herewards House

15 Ray Park Avenue, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 8DP
01628629038
Care Type

Residential Care

Assessment date

4 February 2026

Provider

Herewards House Ltd

Beds

27 beds

About Herewards House

Herewards House is a residential care home located in Windsor and Maidenhead, South East. Its registered care categories include dementia, older people, and younger adults. The home has 27 beds. CQC records an overall rating of Requires Improvement, published in May 2026. The home is operated by Herewards House Ltd.

Specialist Care

DementiaOlder peopleYounger adults

Fees and availability

We have not verified a current weekly fee for this home. Ask for a written quote based on the room and care needed, including any extra charges.

Check current vacancies, the admission assessment and visiting arrangements directly with the home.

Care and inspection details

Checked against the CQC register on 20 September 2026. This is a check of published information, not a visit to the home.

Registered service
Care home service without nursing
Registered capacity
27 places — this is not a vacancy count
Registration checked
Registered · SL6 8DP

Registered care categories

Caring for adults over 65 yrs; Caring for adults under 65 yrs; Dementia.

These describe the registration. The home must assess whether it can meet the individual person's needs and whether a place is available.

CQC ratings in more detail

Overall rating shown by CQC: Requires Improvement.

Assessment published 21 May 2026. Assessment date recorded: 4 February 2026.

Read CQC's assessment overview

The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 21 May 2026. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.

Date of assessment: 23 and 25 February 2026. The service is a care home without nursing providing care and support to older people, younger adults, and people living with dementia. At the time of assessment, 25 people were using the service. The service had not been assessed and rated under the current methodology, so we completed a comprehensive assessment.

At our last inspection, the service was rated requires improvement and was in breach of 1 legal regulation in relation to management of medicine. At this assessment, we found a continued breach of legal regulation in relation to medicine management. We found new breaches of legal regulations relating to fit and proper persons employed, notifications and good governance. We discussed the issues and discrepancies we identified with the management team and they started making improvements.

The provider did not always ensure they used robust assurance systems and governance processes which operated across all levels of the service. Staff had not received all their training to ensure they had the most current knowledge and skills. The provider did not always ensure staff kept clear and complete records of people’s care and treatment plans and risk mitigation. The provider needed to make some improvements to ensure the environment was developed to meet the needs of people living with dementia. Some areas of premises safety needed improvement. We found there were improvements needed to ensure issues were identified and mitigated using provider's quality assurance system. The areas included risk monitoring records for people, aspects of environment safety and suitability. This meant people were at risk of harm and not receiving care they needed. The provider did not always ensure safe and proper management of medicines and recruitment. We found the provider did not inform us and the local authority about some of the notifiable incidents in a timely manner. The provider did not demonstrate they maintained consistent records to meet requirements of duty of candour. The provider had to ensure the service was consistently well-managed and improvements were sustained and embedded. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

We found the management led an inclusive, caring and compassionate culture of the service with clear dedication and were well respected by people, relatives and staff. The management ensured sufficient staff were available to meet people's needs, covering shifts to ensure consistency in care was provided. Staff felt well supported and believed everyone worked to provide a good service for people. People had some activities and opportunities to pursue their interests in their local area with others. People’s relatives were involved in reviewing and planning their care. People’s views and decisions were listened to and considered. The provider and the staff team worked together to ensure the risks of a closed culture were minimised so that people received support based on transparency, respect and a positive culture in the service. Staff were supported to be involved in the development and continuous improvement of the service. The management team was visible within the service and worked together with staff leading by example. Staff were aware how they protected people from abuse and how they would report incidents, accidents and other concerns. Staff felt confident the issues would be addressed appropriately by the registered manager and the provider. Staff ensured people were protected from the risk of acquiring an infection during the provision of their care. Staff supported people to access different services and support from health and social care professionals to promote and achieve positive outcomes for people. Staff understood the principles of good care and treatment. People’s rights around privacy and dignity were considered and respected.

Safe
Requires Improvement
Effective
Good
Caring
Good
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Questions prompted by these ratings

  • Safe: What changes have been made to medicines, staffing and safeguarding since this rating?
  • Well-led: What has changed in management, checks and oversight since this rating?

These are questions for your visit, not a claim about conditions today.

Read Herewards House's CQC record and reports.

Contains Care Quality Commission information under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ratings and registration details can change after the date checked.

5 Questions to Ask on Your Visit

When visiting Herewards House, consider asking...

  1. 1.What specific dementia training do staff receive and how recently?
  2. 2.How do you support a resident who becomes distressed or confused?
  3. 3.How does the home keep a record of a resident's life history and personal preferences?
  4. 4.How do you involve families as dementia progresses and communication becomes harder?
  5. 5.What happens when a resident's dementia reaches an advanced stage?

5 Things to Look For on Your Visit

When you visit Herewards House, look out for...

  1. 1.Is the environment calm, uncluttered and easy to navigate?
  2. 2.Do staff speak to residents with patience and dignity, even if they repeat themselves?
  3. 3.Are there memory cues around the home -- photos, familiar objects, clear signage?
  4. 4.Do residents seem settled and safe, or agitated and unsupervised?
  5. 5.Is there meaningful activity happening, or are residents just sitting quietly with nothing to do?

Could the NHS fund Herewards House's fees?

The average nursing home costs £1,535 per week. That's £79,820 a year. NHS Continuing Healthcare could cover all of it. No means test, no contribution from you.

Location

15 Ray Park Avenue, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 8DP

CQC Logo

Herewards House

CQC overall rating

Requires Improvement

Assessment date: 4 February 2026

View full inspection report
New

Have a question about this care home?

Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.

Share what's on your mind
01628629038