Skip to main content
Placeholder image for Edwardian
EdwardianStockton-on-Tees

Illustrative image. Photographs of this home have not yet been added.

Rated:GoodResidential

Edwardian

72 Yarm Road, Stockton On Tees, Cleveland, TS18 3PQ
01642634113
Care Type

Residential Care

Assessment date

31 December 2025

Provider

Edwardian Residential Care Homes Limited

Beds

11 beds

About Edwardian

Edwardian is a residential care home located in Stockton-on-Tees, North East. Its registered care categories include learning disabilities and mental health. The home has 11 beds. CQC records an overall rating of Good, published in June 2026. The home is operated by Edwardian Residential Care Homes Limited.

Specialist Care

Learning disabilitiesMental health

Fees and availability

We have not verified a current weekly fee for this home. Ask for a written quote based on the room and care needed, including any extra charges.

Check current vacancies, the admission assessment and visiting arrangements directly with the home.

Care and inspection details

Checked against the CQC register on 20 September 2026. This is a check of published information, not a visit to the home.

Registered service
Care home service without nursing
Registered capacity
11 places — this is not a vacancy count
Registration checked
Registered · TS18 3PQ

Registered care categories

Learning disabilities; Mental health conditions.

These describe the registration. The home must assess whether it can meet the individual person's needs and whether a place is available.

CQC ratings in more detail

Overall rating shown by CQC: Good.

Assessment published 1 June 2026. Assessment date recorded: 31 December 2025.

Read CQC's assessment overview

The following is CQC's published account of its assessment, published 1 June 2026. References to “we” mean CQC. It describes findings at that time.

Edwardian is a care home for adults with learning disabilities or autism spectrum disorders, or mental health. The service had 9 residents living there at the time of inspection. The people living at the service ranged in age from the 20s to 70s and were from diverse backgrounds.

The service was last inspected in February 2018 and was rated good. At this inspection we found the service remained good.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

This inspection took place from 20 January 2026 to 14 February 2026. Site visits took place on 20 January and 12 February 2026. The first visit was unannounced, the second took place out of hours.

Care records were stored on a secure electronic system with updates input on tablets. A new staff member had been recruited to assist with the transition from paper-based to electronic records – this had been accomplished well in the last 12 months.

People's care records contained clear and easy to understand information about their individual needs and risks and how to support them effectively.

For those people who were not always able to express their needs and wishes verbally or when a person had declining mental health, staff used personalised communication profiles, including descriptions of each person’s gestures and body language, which enabled them to recognise early signs of distress and respond before concerns escalated.

People received their medicine safely and were supported to access the support of health care professionals when needed.

The provider had taken steps to minimise the risk of abuse because staff knew how to identify and report it. Staff immediately escalated a concern about a person who had a fall, and managers shared this promptly with health services, the local authority and CQC.

Team meetings included short safeguarding reflection exercises where staff discussed learning from national cases and how it applied to their service.

There were enough staff to meet people's needs. Robust recruitment and selection procedures were in place and appropriate checks had been undertaken before staff began work. Staff told us they received training to enable them to carry out their role. Staff received effective supervision and a yearly appraisal.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People were supported to take positive risks to engage with the community as independently as possible, for example going to the cinema in a small group; another person was able to gain part-time employment, and another had started volunteering.

People were encouraged to personalise their rooms, and staff supported people to create a memory wall in the activities and social space which helped them manage periods of low mood.

People received a varied and nutritional diet and were complimentary of the food provided. People were encouraged to support food preparation and choices were always respected.

The interactions between people and staff showed staff knew people well. Staff had good knowledge of people's needs and spoke with genuine affection about the people they supported. The atmosphere at the home was homely, relaxed and nurturing. It was clear people felt relaxed and comfortable in the company of staff. The management team were approachable, and they, alongside the staff team worked in collaboration with external agencies to provide good outcomes for people. Processes were in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service provided and drive improvement.

The service fully lived up to the principles of Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture – focusing on people’s strengths and promoting what they can do but also meeting their dreams and ambitions.

Safe
Good
Effective
Good
Caring
Good
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Good

Read Edwardian's CQC record and reports.

Contains Care Quality Commission information under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Ratings and registration details can change after the date checked.

5 Questions to Ask on Your Visit

When visiting Edwardian, consider asking...

  1. 1.What happens if my relative's care needs increase significantly -- will they have to move?
  2. 2.How do you handle concerns or complaints from families?
  3. 3.What does the monthly fee cover and what will cost extra?
  4. 4.How do you keep families informed about their relative's day-to-day wellbeing?
  5. 5.What happens if my relative is unhappy here?

5 Things to Look For on Your Visit

When you visit Edwardian, look out for...

  1. 1.Do staff greet residents by name and stop to chat?
  2. 2.Are residents dressed, up and occupied, or sitting alone in front of a TV?
  3. 3.Does the home smell fresh and feel clean without being clinical?
  4. 4.Do residents look comfortable and at ease, or anxious and withdrawn?
  5. 5.Does the manager answer your questions openly or deflect?

Could the NHS fund Edwardian's fees?

The average nursing home costs £1,535 per week. That's £79,820 a year. NHS Continuing Healthcare could cover all of it. No means test, no contribution from you.

Location

72 Yarm Road, Stockton On Tees, Cleveland, TS18 3PQ

CQC Logo

Edwardian

CQC overall rating

Good

Assessment date: 31 December 2025

View full inspection report
New

Have a question about this care home?

Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.

Share what's on your mind
01642634113