
Can You Give Away Assets to Avoid Care Home Fees?
Care home fees in England can easily reach £50,000 a year or more. The short answer is yes — but the council can still pursue you, and the person you gave the assets to, for the fees they would have charged. This guide explains exactly how deprivation of assets works and what actually protects families under English law.
Last updated: June 2026
In this guide
The 7-Year Rule Is a Myth
Let's get this out of the way first, because it's the most dangerous piece of misinformation in this area.
There is no 7-year rule for care home fees.
The 7-year rule comes from inheritance tax law. If you give assets away and survive 7 years, those gifts fall outside your estate for inheritance tax purposes. That's real — but it has nothing to do with care home fees.
Care home deprivation law is governed by Section 70 of the Care Act 2014. That law has no time limit written into it. There is no date after which a transfer becomes automatically safe. Councils have pursued transfers made 10 or even 15 years earlier when the circumstances suggested deliberate avoidance.
This doesn't mean every old transfer is at risk. What it does mean is that time alone won't protect you. What actually matters is far more specific — and more defensible — than most people realise.
Critical: Don't Rely on the 7-Year Rule
Many families give away assets thinking they'll be safe after 7 years. This is based on inheritance tax law and does not apply to care home fees.
The Care Act 2014 has no time limit. What matters is your health and circumstances at the time of the transfer — not how long ago it was.
What Is Deprivation of Assets?
Deprivation of assets is the legal term for when someone deliberately reduces their assets to avoid paying for care.
Before a council can call something deprivation, they must prove all three of the following:
The Three-Part Test for Deprivation
Could Have Foreseen Care
You could have foreseen that you might need care when you gave the assets away.
Knew You Would Contribute
You knew you would have to contribute towards the cost of that care.
Avoiding Costs Was Significant
Avoiding care costs was a significant reason for making the transfer.
The council has to prove all three. If they can't, the transfer may not count as deprivation — even if it looks suspicious on the surface.
This three-part test is your most important protection, and it's why the circumstances of a transfer matter far more than its timing.

What Counts as Deprivation
Some transfers are almost certain to be treated as deprivation:
Giving Away Large Sums Shortly Before Care
If you transfer significant assets — cash, property, investments — within months of needing care, and you were already showing health problems at the time, councils will treat this as deliberate avoidance.
Putting Your House Into a Trust After a Diagnosis
Asset protection trusts are widely marketed by solicitors as a way to shield your home from care fees. But if you set one up after a diagnosis, after a fall, or at a point where care was foreseeable, the council will likely treat it as deprivation. The timing undermines the entire structure.
Giving Away Everything at Once
A sudden, unusual transfer of your entire savings with no documented reason, close to the point of needing care, is one of the clearest signs of deliberate avoidance.
What Doesn't Count as Deprivation
Not every transfer is treated as deprivation. Councils must consider legitimate reasons for financial decisions.
Spending Money on Yourself
Spending money on yourself is never deprivation. If you used your savings on holidays, home improvements, hobbies, or experiences, that money is simply spent. There is nothing the council can do about it — your capital has reduced, which is entirely legal.
Consistent Lifetime Gifting
If you have given money to children regularly over decades — for birthdays, weddings, helping with deposits — continuing that pattern is defensible. The council has to show your motivation was care avoidance, which is difficult when the behaviour predates any health concerns by years.
Helping Family in Genuine Hardship
If you gave money to a child who was facing bankruptcy or losing their home, and you were in good health at the time, councils will struggle to argue avoiding care costs was your main motivation.
Charitable Giving
Charitable giving with a documented history is generally safer than family transfers, particularly if the charity was one you had supported for years.
Transfers Made When Young and Healthy
If you gave assets away a decade or more ago and were completely well at the time, the council has to show you were already thinking about care — which becomes increasingly implausible the further back the transfer was.
What Councils Can Actually Do
If a council decides a transfer was deprivation, they have several powers under Section 70 of the Care Act 2014.
They Can Treat You as if You Still Own the Assets
Your financial assessment is calculated as though the transferred assets never left your ownership. If giving away £200,000 would have taken you below the self-funding threshold, the council simply ignores the transfer and continues to assess you as having that money.
They Can Chase the Person Who Received the Gift
This is the part most families don't realise. The person who received the transferred assets can be made personally liable to the council for the difference in fees. Their liability is capped at the value of what they received — so if you gave your son £100,000 and he received all of it, the council can pursue him for up to £100,000.
They Can Place a Legal Charge on Property
If you transferred your house, the council can register a legal charge against it even though you no longer own it. When your relative eventually sells, the council gets paid from the proceeds before anyone else.
They Can Pursue Your Estate After Death
If you die with an outstanding deprivation debt, the council can claim against your estate. Your executors must pay the council before any inheritance is distributed to your family.
Your Family Can Be Held Liable
Many families don't realise that the council can pursue the person who received the gift for the value they received.
If you give your house to your children and the council determines it was deprivation, they can place a legal charge on the property or demand payment from your children up to the value of what they received.
Does Putting Your House in a Trust Work?
Asset protection trusts are widely sold as a way to put your home beyond the reach of care fees. The honest answer is: it depends almost entirely on when you do it.
When Trusts Are Legitimate
If you set up a trust when you are young, healthy, and there is no foreseeable care need — as part of genuine long-term estate planning — it is a legitimate legal structure. Many people do this in their 50s or early 60s as part of sensible financial planning.
When Trusts Become Deprivation
If you set up a trust after a diagnosis, following a fall or decline, or at a point where you could reasonably foresee needing care, the council will almost certainly treat it as deprivation. The legal structure of the trust doesn't protect you — the timing destroys the argument.
Be Cautious of Marketing
Be cautious about solicitors who actively market these arrangements to older people. The arrangement may be legal in isolation, but the circumstances around it may not be.
What Actually Protects You Legally
The most reliable ways to reduce what you pay for care — without the risk of deprivation — are:
1. Spend on Yourself
Use your savings on things you enjoy. Holidays, home improvements, hobbies, experiences. Your capital reduces legitimately. The council cannot call spending on your own life deprivation.
2. Make a Deferred Payment Agreement
This is a formal arrangement with the council where your care fees are paid against the value of your home, recovered when it is eventually sold. You get the care you need without selling your home during your lifetime. It is the government's own recommended solution for people with property.
Learn more about Deferred Payment Agreements →
3. Plan Early
If you want to give assets to family, do it when you are young and healthy, document your reasons clearly, and maintain a consistent pattern over many years. The further your transfer is from any foreseeable care need, the harder it is for the council to prove intent.
4. Get Proper Legal Advice
A solicitor who specialises in social care law can help you understand what is and isn't defensible in your specific situation. Don't rely on general financial advice or internet forums.
How to Challenge a Deprivation Decision
If a council decides a transfer was deprivation and you believe they are wrong, you have a clear route to challenge.
1. Request Written Justification
The council must set out in writing why they believe the transfer was deprivation and which elements of the three-part test they say are satisfied. If they cannot do this clearly, their decision is on weak ground.
2. Make a Formal Complaint
Every council has a formal complaints process. Use it. Set out why you believe the three-part test has not been met — what your health was at the time, what your documented reasons were, why care avoidance was not a significant motivation.
3. Escalate to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman
If the council does not resolve your complaint, the Ombudsman can investigate. This is free, independent, and councils take it seriously.
4. Seek Legal Advice
A social care solicitor can advise on whether you have grounds to challenge, and can write to the council on your behalf. Many cases are resolved at this stage without going to court.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a time limit after which transfers are safe?
No. The Care Act 2014 has no time limit. Councils find it harder to prove intent the further back a transfer was, but there is no date that makes a transfer automatically safe. The 7-year rule from inheritance tax law does not apply to care home fees.
Can the council take my house?
Not directly. But they can place a legal charge on it, meaning it cannot be sold or remortgaged without paying the council first. If they pursue you as a self-funder, you may need to sell your home to pay fees — or arrange a deferred payment agreement.
What if I gave money to my children years ago?
The council can still investigate it. What matters is your health at the time, whether you could have foreseen needing care, and what your documented reasons were. The further back and the healthier you were, the more defensible the position.
Can the council chase my children for money?
Yes. Under Section 70 of the Care Act, the person who received the transferred asset can be made personally liable to the council, up to the value of what they received.
Is spending money on myself safe?
Yes. Spending your savings on holidays, home improvements, and personal enjoyment is never deprivation. You are simply using your own money on your own life, which is entirely legal.
What if I put my house in trust years ago?
If the trust was set up when you were young and healthy with no foreseeable care need, it is more defensible. If it was set up close to a diagnosis or decline, councils will scrutinise it heavily and may treat it as deprivation regardless of the legal structure.
What happens if I die before paying?
The council can pursue your estate. Your executors must pay the outstanding amount before any inheritance is distributed to your beneficiaries.
Can I pay for care privately to avoid the issue?
If you remain a self-funder throughout, the deprivation issue becomes less relevant. But if you later ask the council for financial support, they can look back at your financial history and challenge prior transfers at that point.
The Bottom Line
The law on deprivation of assets is not a trap for ordinary families. It exists to prevent people with significant wealth from deliberately impoverishing themselves to get the state to pay for care they could afford.
The council's burden is to prove all three elements: that you foresaw care, that you knew you would have to pay, and that avoiding costs was a significant reason for your decision. If you can show any of those elements is missing — through your health at the time, your documented reasons, or the consistency of your financial behaviour — you have a defensible case.
The most important things are to be honest, to document your reasons for any significant financial decisions, and to take proper legal advice early. The 7-year rule will not protect you. Your circumstances, your health at the time, and your documented intentions will.
Important: This guide covers England only. Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland have different rules. This is educational information, not legal advice. Anyone facing a deprivation allegation should seek advice from a solicitor specialising in social care law.
Could the NHS pay for your relative's care home fees?
NHS Continuing Healthcare is free care home funding — no means test, no savings limit. Many families don't know about it. The CHC Family Guide explains exactly how to claim it.
Find out in the CHC Family Guide — £37Have a question this guide didn't answer?
Ask in our Community Forum and get a real answer from someone who's been through it.
Share what's on your mindRelated Guides
Could the NHS pay for your relative's care home fees?
NHS Continuing Healthcare is free care home funding — no means test, no savings limit. Many families don't know about it. The CHC Family Guide explains exactly how to claim it.
Find out in the CHC Family Guide — £37